The Twin Towers were not the only structures in the multi-building World Trade Center complex to collapse into their own footprint at near freefall speed ten years ago: World Trade Center 7 (WTC7) also collapsed.
Since no airplane was claimed to have struck WTC7, there were only two main theories ever given for the 47-story building's rapid and perfect collapse straight downward, where it avoided hitting all the neighboring buildings: 1) fires on various floors due to debris from the Twin Towers caused the collapse, even though no such thing had ever happened in the history of fires and construction, and also did not happen to the other buildings in the complex that were burning from debris that day, or 2) WTC7 was professionally demolished.
In fact, if you watch footage of the building falling to the ground, you will see that the collapse appears identical to implosions that are done routinely to remove old buildings in the middle of cities.
The official investigative team, working with little or no hard evidence whatsoever, concluded years after the incident that the collapse of WTC7 was a new structural engineering phenomenon, and issued new guidelines for architects, engineers and builders to consider in the future design and construction of buidings. Here's a great (sarcastic) video on this topic.
Luckily for the building's owner, Larry Silverstein, WTC7 just happened to be located on a different tract of land than the other World Trade Center buildings, and his ground lease said that he could rebuild the building without delays for extensive approvals if it was ever destroyed.
While the powers that be have spent years tossing around ideas for the design and construction of a proper 9/11 memorial, Silverstein was already pitching his grand plans for the replacement WTC7 only four months after its destruction, while people were visiting Ground Zero hoping to see the still-smoldering ruins. A few months later, construction was already underway.
The new and improved 7 World Trade Center became the first "green" certified building in New York City. It usually takes considerable planning and time to design a building that will meet standards of green certification, but Silverstein was on the ball having his plans together for a 52-story replacement building in a matter of months.
Everything has worked out great for Silverstein, who also owned the lease for the Twin Towers. He got a few billion dollars in insurance money for the Twin Towers, plus government money to help rebuild the WTC7.
Odd that the government would rather conclude that there are new laws of nature at work --somehow only in operation on 9/11 -- than investigate other possible causes of the collapse of WTC7 and the Twin Towers. After all, outside of 9/11, no skyscraper has ever collapsed completely in seconds into its own footprint from fire, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, bombings or any other cause aside from professional demolitions.
A former leader of Italy once announced that it was common knowledge among European intelligence organizations that the Mossad and CIA were behind the entire 9/11 incident, according to some sources, and that it was a "false flag" operation, meaning an act made to look like someone else did it. The Mossad is the spy wing of the Israeli government, and they allegedly have a history of creating fake acts of terrorism to get various governments to take action against their enemies -- the Muslim countries that surround Israel in this case. Since 9/11, the United States has certainly taken that sort of action.
Although the numbers of workers for the Mossad is small, the organization has thousands of people at its disposal all around the world, since they routinely call on Jews who support Israel to help in their operations, according to a New York Times #1 Bestseller called By Way of Deception. That book was written by a former Mossad agent, and it lists numerous acts of international terrorism that were blamed on Muslims, that supposedly the Mossad was behind.
Could Silverstein have cooperated with the Mossad to create a fake act of Muslim terrorism on 9/11 for their mutual benefit? He certainly has ties to Israel. So do other individuals and companies whose names have come up in relation to 9/11. Furthermore, Israelis who are alleged Mossad agents have been detained in the United States on several occasions, including on 9/11.
Could the CIA and other branches of government have known about the plan, looked the other way, cooperated or covered up, like a new Pearl Harbor, because the government wanted Americans to support military action in Iraq and elsewhere to advance American oil and other interests in the Middle East?
In the past, I didn't question whether Muslims had committed an act of terrorism against the U.S. on 9/11, and I certainly didn't question official lines given by our government -- after all, it's God, country and family, right? But when the only explanation the government can come up with after years of study is that the laws of nature were suspended or changed on that day, I really have to draw the line and use my brain to look for an alternative answer.
There are simply too many pieces of the puzzle of 9/11 that do not fit together, starting with WTC7 and continuing to the attack on the Pentagon (where a plane supposedly vaporized, which would be another new scientific phenomenon breaching laws of nature since other plane crashes always leave behind debris); to evidence being rapidly carted away from the scene of the crime (steel from the Twin Towers, e.g.); to delayed investigations and thwarted lawsuits and so on -- too much to put into one blog post. Numerous websites are devoted to these topics, however, for anyone who wants to find out more.
Of course, anyone who questions the official line is ridiculed as a "conspiracy theorist," or worse derided as anti-Israel or anti-Semite, just for speculating over Mossad involvement or pointing out that the leasehold owner of the buildings was Jewish. I also speculate over CIA involvement, but that doesn't make me anti-American. As for the Jewish part, facts are facts. To counter the so-called conspiracy theorists, there are numerous websites that "debunk" the theories.
What do you think -- was 9/11 new science, or science fiction?
There are simply too many pieces of the puzzle of 9/11 that do not fit together, starting with WTC7 and continuing to the attack on the Pentagon
Posted by: UGG Bailey Button Triplet | 12/07/2011 at 02:44 AM
To work Office 2010 in a computer-oriented environment with Microsoft outlook office suites
Posted by: Office 2010 | 12/28/2011 at 02:37 AM